U.S. investors deserve clear, balanced
information about risks, fees, conflicts,
tax impact, and reporting obligations.
U.S. investors deserve clear, balanced
Disclaimer
Frequently Asked Questions
We do not provide tax advice, but we do provide education.
Here are some key points and U.S. tax provisions to be aware of.
All About PFICs
What is a PFIC?
- Income Test: 75% or more of its gross income for the taxable year is passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, rents, royalties, or capital gains from passive assets).
- Asset Test: 50% or more of the average percentage of assets held by the corporation during the taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income by value (or by basis if the corporation is not a publicly traded company).
.
What is the U.S. tax impact of investing in a PFIC?
- Excess Distributions: This includes any gain realized on the sale of PFIC stock and certain distributions that exceed 125% of the average distributions in the prior three years. (if any prior year is zero, you’re in excess distribution territory)
- Punitive Tax Treatment: The excess distribution is allocated ratably over the U.S. person's holding period. The portion allocated to prior years is taxed at the highest ordinary income tax rate in effect for those years (currently 37%), plus a non-deductible interest charge for the deemed tax deferral (currently 7%, compounding daily). This can significantly reduce or eliminate the investment's return.
What is a PFIC Annual Information Statement?
- Information Included: The AIS provides the U.S. shareholder's pro-rata share of the PFIC's ordinary earnings and net capital gain for the tax year.
- Purpose: The information is necessary to complete Part III of IRS Form 8621 and properly report income under the QEF election, which provides more favorable tax treatment than the default excess distribution rules, preserving the ordinary income and capital gains characteristics of Fund income and gains for U.S. taxpayers.
What are inspection rights and books and records?
- Inspection Rights/Books and Records: This refers to the ability, either by law or by agreement, of the U.S. shareholder to inspect the PFIC's books and records to ensure the necessary financial information is properly determined and reported.
- Practicality: While these rights are technically a requirement for a QEF election, in practice, U.S. investors rely on the PFIC itself providing the necessary Annual Information Statement. Without this statement, a QEF election cannot be made, and the investor is limited to the MtM election (if available) or the default punitive tax rules.
What is "Phantom Income?"
Phantom income is taxable income that is not accompanied by a corresponding cash distribution. It represents an investor's share of an entity's earnings or gains that are reinvested or retained by the entity, rather than paid out as cash
The concept of phantom income is central to the Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) tax treatment for Passive Foreign Investment Companies (PFICs).
- Under a valid QEF election, a U.S. investor must include in their gross income each year their pro rata share of the PFIC's earnings, even if no cash distribution is received.
- The investor is required to pay U.S. federal and state taxes on these reported earnings, which can create a liquidity issue if the Fund retains and reinvests all profits.
The two main types of phantom income included under the QEF method are:
- Ordinary Earnings: Taxed at the investor's ordinary income tax rates.
- Net Long-Term Capital Gains: Recognized by the PFIC and generally taxed at the investor's long-term capital gains rates.
Note: When the income is eventually distributed by the fund, the distribution is generally treated as a return of capital, tax-free up to the amount of previously taxed phantom income.
See my article, "The Hidden Cost of Offshore Gains: Why a Stronger Euro Can Increase the U.S. Tax Bill on PFIC “Phantom Income”
What is a Mark to Market (MtM) Election?
- Tax Impact: The U.S. person must report as ordinary income any gain (excess of fair market value over adjusted basis) in the stock as of the end of the tax year, even if the stock is not sold (unrealized gain).
- Losses: Losses are allowed only to the extent of previous Mark-to-Market gains included in income.
- Benefits: This election avoids the excess distribution rules and interest charge.
What is a Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) election?
- Tax Impact: Under QEF, a U.S. shareholder includes their pro-rata share of the PFIC's:
- Ordinary earnings as ordinary income, and
- Net capital gains as long-term capital gains.
- Benefits: This treatment avoids the punitive excess distribution rules and interest charge. Capital gains are taxed at favorable long-term capital gains rates.
- Basis Adjustment: The shareholder's tax basis in the PFIC stock is increased by the amounts included in income and decreased by distributions that were previously taxed.
- Phantom Income: Notably, taxpayers will make tax payments on the PFIC’s ordinary earnings and net capital gains regardless of whether they received any cash from the PFIC. This is often referred to as “phantom income.” For an exploration of the interplay between phantom income, U.S. tax bills, and currency exchange rates (FX), see my article, “The Hidden Cost of Offshore Gains: Why a Stronger Euro Can Increase the U.S. Tax Bill on PFIC “Phantom Income”
What is "Once a PFIC, Always a PFIC?"
- Rule: If a foreign corporation is classified as a PFIC for any year during a U.S. person's holding period, it generally retains its PFIC status with respect to that shareholder for all subsequent years, even if the corporation no longer meets the income or asset tests in later years.
- Impact: This means the shareholder remains subject to the punitive excess distribution tax regime unless a special election (QEF or Mark-to-Market) was made in the first year the entity became a PFIC (a "pedigreed PFIC") or a purging election is made later to cleanse the taint.
What is the U.S. tax impact of unreported lower-tier PFICs?
The punitive PFIC rules apply at each tier. If a U.S. person's indirect interest in a lower-tier PFIC is not properly reported and an election is not made for that lower-tier PFIC, the default Excess Distribution rules will apply to the income and gains generated by that lower-tier entity when those amounts are distributed up the chain or when the upper-tier PFIC is sold. This can lead to a complex and often severe tax liability for the U.S. shareholder.
If a U.S. taxpayer makes a Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) election based on a PFIC Annual Information Statement (AIS) provided by a Fund, and the Fund holds lower-tier PFICs that have not been properly disclosed and carved out of the Fund income nad gains reported on the AIS, the QEF election is technically invalid because the AIS is faulty.
An invalid QEF election has several severe consequences:
- The U.S. taxpayer reverts to Excess Distribution taxation on all income and gains from the fund itself as well a the lower-tier PFICs held by the fund.
- Daily compounding interest will also be applied to the deferred tax liability.
- The statute of limitations for the entire tax return will remain open until a valid Form 8621 is submitted, pursuant to IRC § 6501(c)(8).
What is a de minimis exemption?
- Rule: A U.S. person is not required to file Form 8621 if:
- They did not receive an excess distribution or recognize gain treated as an excess distribution during the tax year, AND
- The aggregate value of all PFIC stock owned directly or indirectly by the shareholder is $25,000 or less ($50,000$ or less if married filing jointly) at the end of the tax year.
Important Caveat: This exemption only relieves the annual reporting requirement (Form 8621) but generally does not relieve the shareholder from the underlying punitive PFIC taxation on any eventual excess distribution or disposition gain, nor does it excuse a U.S. person who has made a QEF or Mark-to-Market election.
What is an upper-tier and a lower-tier PFIC?
- Upper-Tier PFIC: A PFIC that directly owns the stock of another PFIC (the lower-tier PFIC). This is the PFIC the U.S. shareholder owns directly or through a non-PFIC entity.
- Lower-Tier PFIC: A PFIC that is owned (directly or indirectly) by another PFIC.
- The "Look-Through" Rule: If a foreign corporation owns 25% or more (by value) of the stock of another corporation, it is treated as holding a proportionate share of the assets and earning a proportionate share of the income of that subsidiary for purposes of applying the PFIC tests.
What are examples of lower-tier PFICs?
- Startups/Operating Companies: A foreign startup or operating company can often meet the definition of a PFIC in its initial years because a significant portion of its assets (from investor capital) is held as cash-on-hand, term deposits, or money market funds. If this cash exceeds the 50% asset threshold before the funds are deployed into active business assets, the company is a PFIC. Due to the "Once a PFIC Always a PFIC" rule, this initial "taint" can subject the shareholder to punitive tax treatment upon disposition years later, even if the company becomes a successful operating business.
- "Cash Sleeves" in Funds: Investment funds (such as private equity or venture capital funds) may use "cash sleeves" like term deposits and money market funds to hold capital during their initial pre-deployment fundraise stage or during pre-distribution liquidation events. These cash holdings are passive assets and often them-selves meet the definition of PFIC.
What is a Deemed Sale purging election?
- Scenario: This election is used when a foreign corporation was a PFIC in prior years (resulting in the "once a PFIC, always a PFIC" rule applying) and the shareholder is now making a QEF election for the current year.
- Action: The shareholder is deemed to have sold the PFIC stock for its fair market value on the "qualification date" (the first day of the tax year the QEF election takes effect).
- Tax Impact: Any unrealized gain on the stock is recognized and taxed under the punitive excess distribution regime, including the tax and interest charge. Any realized loss is generally not recognized.
Why does the PFIC regime exist?
- Deferring U.S. Tax: U.S. taxpayers could invest in foreign corporations that earned passive income and defer paying U.S. tax until the income was repatriated or the stock was sold.
- Converting Ordinary Income to Capital Gain: If the income was eventually realized as gain on the sale of stock, it was taxed at the lower long-term capital gains rates.
When can a Purging Election be made?
A Purging Election (Deemed Sale or Deemed Dividend) must be made in the shareholder's election year, which is generally the year the PFIC stock either successfully qualifies as a QEF or ceases to be a PFIC.
1. Timely Purging Election (on Form 8621)
The deadline for a timely election depends on the original filing date for the relevant tax year.
- When to File: The election must be made on Form 8621.
- Deadline: You must file the election on your original return or an amended return for the tax year that includes the qualification date (or termination date for a former PFIC).
- Time Limit: If filed on an amended return, it must be submitted within three years of the due date (as extended) of the original return for the election year.
- Interest Charge: If the election is made on an amended return after the original due date, you must pay additional interest on the amount of tax underpayment for that year
2. Late Purging Election (After the Deadline)
If the three-year window for amending the return has closed, the election is considered a late purging election.
- When to File: A late purging election is made using Form 8621-A, Return by a Shareholder Making Certain Late Elections To End Treatment as a Passive Foreign Investment Company.
- Filing Trigger: This form is used after 3 years from the due date (as extended) of the tax return for the tax year that includes the qualification date.
Key Point: Simultaneous QEF Election
For a PFIC that remains a PFIC (a "continuing PFIC"), the shareholder must make a purging election simultaneously with a QEF election to successfully clear the PFIC taint and avoid the punitive Excess Distribution rules in the future. Without the simultaneous QEF election, the stock would remain subject to Excess Distribution rules.
What is a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC)?
If U.S. investors were early investors in an offshore Fund, it’s possible that they met the definition of a U.S. Shareholder for CFC purposes, even if just for a day. U.S. Shareholders in CFCs have a different set of reporting and tax obligations.
Our PFIC Exposure Diagnostic also investigates CFC exposure.
What is a U.S. Shareholder for Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) purposes?
PFIC/CFC Overlap: If a foreign corporation is both a PFIC and a CFC, generally the CFC rules take priority over the PFIC rules for U.S. Shareholders who own 10% or more. This is known as the "CFC/PFIC overlap rule."
All About Exposure
What can I do if I don't know whether the Fund(s) I invested in hold any lower-tier PFICs?
Reviewing Fund Documents: Look for language in the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) or subscription agreement that addresses U.S. tax treatment, PFIC status, and if the fund agrees to provide a PFIC Annual Information Statement (AIS).
Requesting Information: Directly ask the Fund/General Partner (GP) if they hold any lower-tier PFICs and if they have prepared the necessary tax information (including an AIS) for those lower-tier entities.
Consulting a Tax Professional: Engage an international tax specialist experienced with PFICs to:
- review the fund's structure, (PFICHelp does this)
- review your investment, (PFICHelp does this)
- review whether to engage in the IRS’ Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures (SFCP). The SFCP is the primary method for non-compliant U.S. taxpayers to voluntarily come into compliance and avoid severe penalties. It is available only to those whose failure to file was non-willful (due to negligence, mistake, or misunderstanding), a position strongly supported if you relied on a faulty Fund-issued document.
- Non-Willful vs. Willful: If classified as non-willful, the Streamlined Procedures eliminate penalties for failure to file international forms like Form 8621. If classified as willful (intent to evade tax), the investor is ineligible for SFCP and faces the significantly higher penalty structure of the Voluntary Disclosure Practice (VDP), which can include civil fraud penalties of 75% and criminal exposure.
- Form 8621 Consequences: While there is no direct monetary penalty for failure to file Form 8621, the non-filing of the form for the lower-tier PFIC prevents the running of the Statute of Limitations, potentially leaving your entire tax return open to an IRS audit indefinitely. The Streamlined Procedures remedy this by requiring you to file the delinquent Forms 8621 and pay the underlying PFIC tax liability (often via a Deemed Sale Purging Election) to finally close the tax years.
Why should I be concerned about my own QEF election if I haven't heard anything from the IRS?
More critically, if the upper-tier Fund's Annual Information Statement (AIS) failed to properly exclude or "carve out" the non-QEF income from the lower-tier PFIC, the entire QEF election for the upper-tier fund is technically invalid. This reverts the entire fund investment to Excess Distribution taxation.
Additionally, the non-filing of Form 8621 for the lower-tier PFIC, pursuant to IRC § 6501(c)(8), prevents the Statute of Limitations from running, leaving your entire tax return open to an IRS audit indefinitely. The Streamlined Procedures remedy this by requiring you to file the delinquent Forms 8621 and pay the underlying PFIC tax liability (often via a Deemed Sale Purging Election, if available) to finally close the tax years.
When can a Purging Election such as a Deemed Sale be made?
A Purging Election (Deemed Sale or Deemed Dividend) must be made in the shareholder's election year, which is generally the year the PFIC stock either successfully qualifies as a QEF or ceases to be a PFIC.
1. Timely Purging Election (on Form 8621)
The deadline for a timely election depends on the original filing date for the relevant tax year.
- When to File: The election must be made on Form 8621.
- Deadline: You must file the election on your original return or an amended return for the tax year that includes the qualification date (or termination date for a former PFIC).
- Time Limit: If filed on an amended return, it must be submitted within three years of the due date (as extended) of the original return for the election year.
- Interest Charge: If the election is made on an amended return after the original due date, you must pay additional interest on the amount of tax underpayment for that year
2. Late Purging Election (After the Deadline)
If the three-year window for amending the return has closed, the election is considered a late purging election.
- When to File: A late purging election is made using Form 8621-A, Return by a Shareholder Making Certain Late Elections To End Treatment as a Passive Foreign Investment Company.
- Filing Trigger: This form is used after 3 years from the due date (as extended) of the tax return for the tax year that includes the qualification date.
Key Point: Simultaneous QEF Election
For a PFIC that remains a PFIC (a "continuing PFIC"), the shareholder must make a purging election simultaneously with a QEF election to successfully clear the PFIC taint and avoid the punitive Excess Distribution rules in the future. Without the simultaneous QEF election, the stock would remain subject to Excess Distribution rules.
What would prevent me from making a Deemed Sale election?
The most common scenarios that prevent a shareholder from successfully making or benefiting from a Deemed Sale Election include:
- Upper-Tier Fund Holding Non-Compliant Lower-Tier PFICs: If the upper-tier fund is still holding lower-tier PFICs that do not furnish an AIS, the upper-tier fund's QEF election is technically invalid. Since a Deemed Sale Election must be made simultaneously with a valid QEF election (for continuing PFICs), the invalidity of the fund's QEF election due to the lower-tier PFICs prevents the purging election from being effective.
- Failure to Pay Tax and Interest: The shareholder must report any gain on the deemed sale as an excess distribution and pay the tax and interest due with the return for the election year. Failure to remit the required payment will invalidate the election.
- No Simultaneous QEF Election (for Continuing PFICs): If the foreign corporation remains a PFIC, the Deemed Sale Election must be made simultaneously with a QEF election. If only the Deemed Sale Election is made, the punitive Excess Distribution rules would technically continue to apply, defeating the purpose of the purge.
- Missing Required Information: The shareholder must be able to accurately calculate the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the stock on the qualification date, as well as their gain and holding period, to complete Form 8621. Lack of this historical data prevents a valid election.
- Exempt Organization Status: If a shareholder is a tax-exempt organization whose income derived from the PFIC stock would not be taxable under Subchapter F, they generally cannot make the election.
How would anyone know about the lower-tier PFICs?
From the perspective of Funds and their Auditors: The fund itself and its auditors are privy to the underlying investment structure. They are responsible for determining the tax status of the fund and its subsidiaries. If a fund issues an AIS for itself but neglects to identify or provide information for lower-tier PFICs, it may be providing incomplete or misleading information.
From the perspective of the U.S. IRS: The IRS primarily relies on the taxpayer's Form 8621 filings and information gathered through international exchange agreements (like FATCA and bilateral tax treaties). While the IRS audit rate is generally low, foreign income is a known area for inquiry and technological improvements within the IRS may improve efficiency for flagging data mismatches. If a taxpayer is audited for a foreign investment, the IRS can request the fund's documentation. If the SEC takes enforcement action against non-compliant offshore funds, the IRS will receive the fund’s documentation. If the fund's documents reveal undisclosed lower-tier PFICs, the investor's return will be deemed non-compliant for those entities, and the punitive tax and interest charges will be assessed.
The IRS staff has been reduced and the audit rate is fairly low. Why shouldn't I just take my chances?
- Punitive Tax & Interest: A successful audit would result in the highest marginal tax rates plus compounded, non-deductible interest charges over the holding period, often leading to an effective tax rate that consumes most of the investment's gain.
- Open Statute of Limitations: Failure to file the required Form 8621 may keep the statute of limitations open indefinitely for the entire tax year, exposing all parts of your tax return to audit risk for many years.
- Lack of Basis Step-up: PFIC shares generally do not qualify for a step-up in basis at death, a tax benefit available to most other assets.
What is SEC Enforcement Action Risk?
Offshore Funds, particularly those in the Golden Visa marketplace, bear numerous hallmarks of non-compliance with U.S. SEC regulations.
1. SEC/FINRA broker-dealer enforcement
The most immediate red flag is the involvement of unregistered financial intermediaries.
- Unregistered Broker-Dealer Activity: The SEC views transaction-based compensation (i.e. commissions tied to a successful sale) as the hallmark of a broker-dealer. Migration agencies, finders, or other unregulated entities that receive a commission for introducing U.S. investors to an offshore fund are likely operating as unregistered broker-dealers.
- SEC Enforcement Target: The SEC is actively cracking down on unregistered broker activity, often resulting in enforcement actions that demand disgorgement of all commissions and fines.
- Aiding and Abetting Violation: The offshore Fund itself, by knowingly paying commissions to an unregistered finder/migration agency for the sale of securities to U.S. persons, is likely aiding and abetting a securities violation.
- Consequence to the Investor: When the SEC takes action, it may seek a rescission of the illegal transactions, potentially allowing the investor to recover their principal. Crucially, the enforcement action will generate a paper trail (court documents, witness testimony, transaction data) that lists the names of every U.S. investor and the details of the illegal offering, handing this information directly to tax authorities.
For an offshore fund to legally sell securities to U.S. investors, it must rely on a registration exemption (like Regulation D, Rule 506) and file a notice with the SEC within 15 days of the first sale.
- Failure to File For an Exemption: If the fund markets to and/or enrolls U.S. investors but fails to file for exemption from full registration of the offering with the SEC, it can indicate a willful disregard for U.S. securities law.
- IRS Inference: The IRS may view the concealment of a U.S.-sourced investment interest from the SEC as a strong indicator that the investors and the fund are attempting to conceal income from the IRS. This failure to register immediately escalates the audit inquiry from a technical compliance error (PFIC) to a potential criminal tax evasion investigation of the investor and the fund.
The fund's aggressive securities posture makes the inevitable PFIC problem a direct target.
- Undisclosed Lower-Tier PFICs: When a fund is already non-compliant with basic SEC filing requirements, it is highly likely that it is also non-compliant with complex tax reporting, such as properly calculating and furnishing an AIS for lower-tier PFICs.
- Audit Focus: In an audit triggered by the SEC/DOJ, the IRS will specifically scrutinize the PFIC-related Forms 8621. The auditor will demand the fund's internal financial statements (which the SEC/DOJ will have obtained via an enforcement action) to determine the true nature of the assets and income. If the audit confirms the existence of unreported lower-tier PFICs, the U.S. investor faces the full, uncapped punitive tax and interest charge on the portion of the gain attributable to the un-QEF elected entities.
Could this have been avoided if I had invested via self directing my IRA?
- PFIC Rules vs. Retirement Plans: Generally, investments held within a U.S. qualified retirement account (like an IRA or 401(k)) are not subject to the PFIC regime because the account itself is tax-deferred.
- Prohibited Transaction Risk: However, using retirement savings for certain foreign investments, such as a Golden Visa investment, constitutes a prohibited transaction under Internal Revenue Code § 4975.
- Self-Benefit: The investment directly benefits the IRA owner (e.g., by providing an immigration benefit, which is a personal, non-retirement-related benefit). This is a violation of the rule against the "transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income or assets of a plan."
- Self-Dealing/Civil Law Risk: If the investment is made in a civil law jurisdiction, the law may not recognize the U.S. trust structure of the IRA. The asset will be titled to the ultimate beneficial owner (the IRA owner), thereby violating § 4975 (e.g., an "act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary whereby he deals with the income or assets of a plan in his own interest").
Consequence: A prohibited transaction causes the IRA to lose its tax-exempt status as of the first day of that tax year. The entire fair market value of the IRA is treated as a taxable distribution, resulting in an immediate and significant tax liability, often compounded by a 10% penalty if the owner is under 59.5 years old. Further, all gains and income from the fund are subject to Excess Distribution tax treatment.
See my video, "Why Using your IRA for a Golden Visa Investment is Asking for a Disaster."
The fund(s) I subscribed to hold lower-tier PFICs and have no intention of divesting of those. What choices do I have?
1. Compliance & Cleansing (best path)
The most favorable long-term solutions are complex and require immediate action:
Push the Fund for an AIS (and Corrective Action): Pressure the fund manager to acknowledge the lower-tier PFICs and provide the necessary PFIC Annual Information Statements (AIS) for those entities. This allows you to make a valid QEF election for the entire chain (likely with a purging election for prior "tainted" years).
Force Fund Divestment: Demand the fund manager sell or divest the lower-tier PFIC holdings immediately. This terminates the tiered compliance problem for future years. If the fund refuses, this refusal may constitute a breach of fiduciary duty or trigger specific remedies if addressed in the fund's offering documents.
2. Alternative Elections (unlikely)
This option is a partial fix that may still be punitive:
Make a Mark-to-Market Election (if possible): If the PFIC shares of the upper-tier fund are considered marketable stock (rarely the case for private funds), you can make this election. This avoids the Excess Distribution methodology but subjects all annual gains and losses to ordinary income tax. A purging election for prior "tainted" years will still be necessary, and separate reporting for the lower-tier PFICs may still be required.
3. Exit Strategies (punitive)
These options stop the future accumulation of tax problems but immediately trigger the most punitive taxation for all past years:
Sell the Upper-Tier PFIC: Exit the investment entirely. Any gains from the upper-tier PFIC will be fully subject to the punitive Excess Distribution rules (Section 1291) on disposition for all prior un-elected years. This involves allocating the gain across your entire holding period, taxing the allocated amounts as ordinary income at the highest rate in effect for each year, plus an interest charge.
Do Nothing (The Taint Risk): This leaves the uncorrected tiered structure in place. The failure to properly report the lower-tier PFIC and/or carve out its income invalidates the QEF election for the entire upper-tier Fund, causing the entire Fund investment to be subject to the punitive Excess Distribution rules. This creates a time bomb of escalating tax and interest liability, and prevents the Statute of Limitations for the entire tax return from running, leaving all prior years open to an IRS audit indefinitely.
Is this a fiduciary breach? What recourse do I have?
It is potentially a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of the contractual obligations set forth in the Fund's Management Regulation, but the specific legal basis depends on the fund's governing documents and jurisdiction (e.g., Portugal).
Fiduciary Duty and Breach
In the context of the offshore funds (often organized under European frameworks like Portugal's), the legal relationship is based on the mandate granted by the investors to the Management Entity (ME) upon subscription, rather than a traditional U.S. General Partner/Limited Partner structure.
Fiduciary Duty: The Management Entity (ME) is generally obligated to act on behalf of and in the exclusive interest of the Participants (investors), in accordance with criteria of high zeal, honesty, diligence, and professional competence.
Potential Breach: A failure to manage a known, highly punitive tax risk like the tiered PFIC regime may constitute a breach of this professional duty. Specifically, providing an incomplete or faulty Annual Information Statement (AIS) that leads a U.S. investor into the Excess Distribution tax trap could be viewed as a failure of professional diligence and competence.
Recourse and Legal Action
Recourse against the Management Entity (ME) and the Fund would be governed by the Fund's Management Regulation and the laws of the fund's jurisdiction.
Breach of Mandate/Contract: The act of subscribing to the Fund's units grants a formal mandate to the Management Entity. Failure to uphold the professional diligence required by that mandate provides a basis for action against the ME.
Forum and Jurisdiction: Legal disputes would typically be resolved in the jurisdiction stipulated in the Management Regulation (e.g., the Court of the District of Lisbon, Portugal, as seen in the documents reviewed).
Potential actions to seek remedy may include:
Demanding Indemnification: Requesting the Management Entity cover the tax, interest, and penalties incurred due to the undisclosed or mismanaged PFIC status.
Legal Action for Damages: Pursuing a lawsuit against the Management Entity to recover damages based on:
Breach of Management Mandate/Diligence.
Breach of Contract (the Management Regulation).
Negotiation: Attempting to negotiate a resolution with the Management Entity, often leveraging the fact that the ME is typically jointly and severally liable with the Depositary for certain compliance failures.
I relied on a faulty PFIC AIS for a QEF election in a prior tax year. What do I do now?
The situation where a Qualified Electing Fund (QEF) election was made based on a faulty or incomplete Annual Information Statement (AIS) is a serious, yet common, compliance issue. It means the PFIC is an unpedigreed QEF for the years affected, and the shareholder is at risk of the punitive excess distribution tax.
Your immediate focus should be on correcting the compliance failure with the IRS. You have two main pathways, which should be discussed thoroughly with a qualified international tax advisor.
Recognizing the Problem: The PFIC Taint
When you relied on a faulty AIS (e.g., one that underreported earnings or failed to disclose a lower-tier PFIC), the IRS views your QEF election as either:
Based on Incorrect Income: The tax calculated and paid under QEF was incorrect, requiring an amended return.
Partially Invalid/Unpedigreed: If the AIS was faulty because it did not include information for a lower-tier PFIC, your QEF election for the upper-tier fund is at risk. If the fund did not properly exclude the lower-tier PFIC's income (the "carve out"), the entire QEF election is invalid.
In either case, the prior years are "tainted," and the investment is considered an Unpedigreed QEF (an entity for which a QEF election was made, but not for the first year it was a PFIC, or which has underlying un-elected PFICs).
1. Correcting the Income (Amended Return)
If the fault in the AIS was a misstatement of the PFIC's income (e.g., they provided one number, but later provided a corrected, higher number), the remedy is generally to amend your prior year's tax return.
File Amended Returns: File an amended Form 1040 (and possibly other forms) and a corrected Form 8621 (Part III) for the years the faulty AIS was used, paying any resulting additional tax and interest.
Maintain QEF Status: This correction maintains your QEF status for the upper-tier entity but ensures the correct income was reported.
2. Purging the "Taint" (Due to Unreported Lower-Tier PFICs)
If the faulty AIS issue is the existence of an unreported lower-tier PFIC, the required QEF election was never made for that lower-tier entity. To fix this, you must "purge" the lower-tier PFIC's taint and make a late QEF election. This typically involves making two elections simultaneously on your current or amended tax return:
A. The Purging Election
You must make an election to clear the "Once a PFIC Always a PFIC" taint for the lower-tier PFIC. The choice is usually between:
Deemed Sale Election (IRC § 1291(d)(2)(A)): You are treated as having sold the lower-tier PFIC stock for its Fair Market Value (FMV) on the qualification date (the first day of the tax year the QEF election is made). Any resulting gain is taxed under the punitive excess distribution rules (highest tax rate + interest charge). This cleanses the taint by making you pay the penalty tax now. Losses are not recognized.
Deemed Dividend Election (IRC § 1291(d)(2)(B)): This is only available if the lower-tier PFIC is also a Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC). It requires you to include in income a pro-rata share of the PFIC's post-1986 accumulated earnings and profits (E&P) as a dividend, which is also taxed under the excess distribution rules.
In the same tax year the purging election is made, you must make a new QEF election for the lower-tier PFIC.
Result: The lower-tier PFIC becomes a Pedigreed QEF for that year and all future years, meaning all future income and gains from that entity will be taxed under the favorable QEF rules.
3. Seeking Retroactive Relief (if possible)
The most desirable solution would be to make a QEF election retroactive to the original acquisition date, avoiding the purging penalty entirely. However, retroactive QEF elections are granted by the IRS in very limited circumstances:
Protective Statement Regime: You must have filed a protective statement with your original tax return, stating that you reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC or were relying on a public notice. This is often not an option for prior years.
Special Consent Regime: You must obtain a Private Letter Ruling (PLR) from the IRS to request consent. To qualify, you must show: (1) reasonable reliance on a qualified tax professional, and (2) that granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the U.S. Government. This is costly and time-consuming, but the only option if the protective statement was not filed.
Do I have rescission rights?
The right to rescind the investment and recover funds is governed by U.S. securities law, not U.S. tax law. A breach depends on whether the Fund's actions or omissions qualify as a material securities violation during the offer or sale.
The Problem: Marketing Promise vs. Legal Document
The legal weight of a promise in marketing materials that contradicts the formal Management Regulation hinges on fraud and material misrepresentation.
Breach: Material Misrepresentation ("Half-Truth"): A claim under SEC Rule 10b-5 (the primary anti-fraud provision) is strongest when an issuer makes a statement that is rendered misleading by a material omission. This is known as a "half-truth".
The Promise: The Fund's marketing affirmatively promising "PFIC compliance" or the issuance of a compliant AIS is an affirmative statement.
The Omission: The Fund's failure to codify this promise (or the subsequent issuance of a faulty AIS) renders the initial promise misleading.
Recourse: This breach is actionable because the Fund chose to speak on the topic of compliance, thereby incurring a duty to speak completely and truthfully. To successfully pursue rescission or damages, the U.S. investor would need to prove:
The misstatement/omission was material (a reasonable investor would rely on the tax compliance promise).
The Fund acted with scienter (intent to deceive or gross recklessness).
The investor relied on the promise when investing.
Recourse and Legal Action
Recourse against the Management Entity (ME) would be sought through the Fund's governing jurisdiction and specific agreements.
Illegal Offering in the U.S.: If the Fund was an unregistered security and failed to meet the technical requirements of its claimed exemption, the investor has a statutory right to rescind the transaction and recover the purchase price under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. If a violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 is proven, the purchaser generally has a one-year right to rescind the transaction and recover the purchase price plus interest, less any income received. State-level (Blue Sky) laws often provide similar statutory rescission rights for unregistered sales.
Damages for Breach of Duty: Since the Management Entity (ME) is bound by a mandate to act in the exclusive interest of the
Participants with "high zeal, honesty, diligence, and professional competence" (the Portuguese standard), the failure to deliver on a critical tax promise that leads to the punitive Excess Distribution regime exposes the ME to claims for breach of fiduciary duty or negligence to recover the resulting tax, interest, and penalties. Legal disputes would typically be resolved in the jurisdiction stipulated in the Management Regulation (e.g., the Court of the District of Lisbon, Portugal).
Depositary's Role: Fund administration activities are generally undertaken by a depositary (custodian bank), which is legally required to verify the Fund's adherence to the investment policy and correct calculation of the Net Asset Value (NAV). If irregularities are detected, the depositary is required to notify the regulator directly. In some structures, the Management Entity is fully liable for all violations and may be held jointly liable with the depositary.
3. No Direct Rescission for Tax Failure: The tax compliance failure itself (the faulty AIS) is unlikely to grant rescission rights directly. Instead, it serves as the evidence of material harm needed to pursue damages or rescission under the securities fraud framework outlined above.
Potential actions to seek remedy may include:
Demanding Indemnification: Requesting the Management Entity cover the tax, interest, and penalties incurred due to the undisclosed or mismanaged PFIC status. (PFICHelp offers Tax Impact calculations)
Legal Action for Damages: Pursuing a lawsuit against the Management Entity to recover damages based on:
Breach of Management Mandate/Diligence.
- Breach of Contract (the Management Regulation).
Negotiation: Attempting to negotiate a resolution with the Management Entity.
Statutory Deadlines for Rescission and Fraud
Rescission for Unregistered Securities
This is the claim that provides the investor with an automatic right to unwind the sale and recover the purchase price, but the window for filing is very short.
- Legal Basis: Section 12(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (for selling an unregistered security that failed to qualify for an exemption).
- The Deadline: A lawsuit must be filed within one year of the violation, but no later than three years after the security was first offered to the public.
Rescission for Misstatement
This claim is for material misstatements or omissions made during the sale process.
- Legal Basis: Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
- The Deadline: A lawsuit must be filed within the earlier of:
- One year after the discovery of the untrue statement or omission.
- Three years after the sale of the security (the absolute deadline).
Damages for Fraud
This is the broader, five-year claim. The recourse here is damages (recovering losses), not statutory rescission.
- Legal Basis: Rule 10b-5 (general anti-fraud, used for claims like broken promises of PFIC compliance).
- The Deadline: A lawsuit must be filed by the earlier of:
- Two years after the discovery of the violation.
- Five years after the violation (the absolute deadline or statute of repose).
Disclaimer
A PFIC Exposure Diagnostic
is the first step to
diagnose a structural flaw.
is the first step to
diagnose a structural flaw.
Uncover your tax exposure in an offshore fund
that meets the definition of a PFIC.
that meets the definition of a PFIC.